The modern developer’s toolkit has changed fundamentally. AI isn’t just an add-on—it’s the foundation of how we work. Here’s how to set up an AI-native development workflow from scratch.
The Stack Overview
Our target stack combines these elements:
- Terminal: Claude Code for command-line AI
- Editor: Cursor with Claude integration
- Search: Perplexity for research
- Deployment: Vercel for instant previews
- Context: Obsidian for knowledge management
Step 1: Terminal Setup
Install Claude Code, Anthropic’s CLI tool:
# Install Claude Code
npm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-code
# Authenticate
claude login
Configure your shell for AI-native commands:
# Add to ~/.zshrc
export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY="your-key-here"
alias cc="claude"
alias ccp="claude plan"
Step 2: Editor Configuration
Download Cursor from cursor.com, then configure it:
- API Keys: Add your Anthropic and OpenAI keys in Settings
- Default Model: Set Claude as your default for chat
- Codebase Indexing: Enable for your main projects
Key settings to enable:
{
"cursor.composer.enabled": true,
"cursor.aiPreview.enabled": true,
"cursor.chat.defaultModel": "claude-3.5-sonnet"
}
Step 3: Context Management
The key to effective AI assistance is providing good context. Create a .cursorrules file in your project root:
# Project Context
## Tech Stack
- Framework: Next.js 15 with App Router
- Styling: Tailwind CSS
- Database: PostgreSQL with Drizzle ORM
- Auth: NextAuth.js
## Conventions
- Use functional components with TypeScript
- Prefer server components by default
- Use Zod for validation
- Error boundaries for client components
## Project Structure
- /app - Next.js app router pages
- /components - Reusable UI components
- /lib - Utility functions and configurations
- /db - Database schema and queries
Step 4: Workflow Patterns
The Scout-Plan-Execute Loop
Before diving into code:
# 1. Scout: Understand the problem
claude "What files would I need to modify to add user authentication?"
# 2. Plan: Get a structured approach
claude plan "Implement GitHub OAuth login"
# 3. Execute: Let AI help implement
# Open Cursor and use Composer for multi-file changes
Daily Workflow
My typical day:
- Morning Review (5 min): Ask Claude to summarize yesterday’s git commits
- Planning (10 min): Use Claude Code to plan the day’s work
- Implementation (3-4 hours): Cursor with AI pair programming
- Review (30 min): AI-assisted code review before commits
Step 5: Knowledge Capture
Create an Obsidian vault for your learnings:
# AI Development Notes
## Prompting Patterns That Work
- Always provide file context
- Be specific about output format
- Include examples when possible
## Tool Quirks
- Claude excels at planning
- GPT-4 is better for quick edits
- Use Perplexity for up-to-date docs
Productivity Metrics
After implementing this workflow, I saw:
| Metric | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Lines of code/day | ~150 | ~400 |
| Bug escape rate | 12% | 6% |
| Time to first deploy | 3 days | 4 hours |
| Context switching | High | Low |
Common Pitfalls
- Over-reliance on AI: Always review generated code
- Poor context: AI is only as good as the information you provide
- Ignoring security: AI can generate insecure code—use linters
- Not learning: Don’t just accept AI output—understand it
Next Steps
Once you’re comfortable with this setup:
- Explore MCP servers for extended AI capabilities
- Set up AI-assisted testing workflows
- Create project-specific AI configurations
The goal isn’t to replace your skills—it’s to amplify them. An AI-native workflow lets you focus on architecture and creativity while AI handles the boilerplate.